<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (functions == objects) =&gt; awesome!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://villane.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/functions-objects-awesome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://villane.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/functions-objects-awesome/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johlrogge</title>
		<link>http://villane.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/functions-objects-awesome/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>johlrogge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://villane.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-62</guid>
		<description>The first scala-code I saw that exploited the fact that functions are objects and hence classes can extend functions was in Szeigers excellent parsing series: http://szeiger.de/blog/2008/07/27/formal-language-processing-in-scala-part-1/

I love the simplicity of your example. Perhaps it would be even easier to understand if n had a value in example or leave out n entirely: 

&quot;1234567&quot;.map(n2s).mkString(&quot; &quot;)

That&#039;s a minor detail that didn&#039;t keep me from sharing your excitement with this feature of Scala. I did not know that maps are also functions, I&#039;ll have to keep my eye out for hidden treats like this in the future.

Thanks for posting this!
/J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first scala-code I saw that exploited the fact that functions are objects and hence classes can extend functions was in Szeigers excellent parsing series: <a href="http://szeiger.de/blog/2008/07/27/formal-language-processing-in-scala-part-1/" rel="nofollow">http://szeiger.de/blog/2008/07/27/formal-language-processing-in-scala-part-1/</a></p>
<p>I love the simplicity of your example. Perhaps it would be even easier to understand if n had a value in example or leave out n entirely: </p>
<p>&#8220;1234567&#8243;.map(n2s).mkString(&#8221; &#8220;)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a minor detail that didn&#8217;t keep me from sharing your excitement with this feature of Scala. I did not know that maps are also functions, I&#8217;ll have to keep my eye out for hidden treats like this in the future.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this!<br />
/J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-09</title>
		<link>http://villane.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/functions-objects-awesome/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-03-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://villane.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] (functions == objects) =&gt; awesome! « Villane [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (functions == objects) =&gt; awesome! « Villane [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
